Indefeasibility of Doubt

George Dalgarno's Sematology and the Idea of a Universal Language in Mid-Seventeenth Century European Philosophy

  • Natalia Osminskaya PhD in Philosophy; Senior Lecturer at the National Research University High School of Economics (Moscow, Russia)
  • Emil Rakhmankulov BA Student at the National Research University High School of Economics (St. Petersburg, Russia)
Keywords: Real Character, Universal Language, Theory of Categories, Doctrine of Signs, Cartesian Linguistics, Rational Grammar

Abstract

This article opens a series of publications of the first Russian translation of George Dalgarno's Latin-language treatise “The Art of Signs”, published in 1661. In his treatise, Dalgarno presents the first full-fledged project to create an artificial philosophical language based on rational principles and organically combining the developed system of universal writing in the form of so-called “real characters” and the phonetic form of verbal language. The article traces the development of Dalgarno's idea from an improved system of shorthand to the project of a full-fledged philosophical language, which was to serve as a universal means of international communication and at the same time contribute to the reform of education. Special attention in the article is paid to the logical justification of Dalgarno's rational grammar. In this connection a comparative analysis of Dalgarno's linguistic doctrine with “General and Rational Grammar” and “Logic” of Port-Royal is carried out. The article shows how, in his theory, Dalgarno changes the Aristotelian categorical scheme and the classical theory of parts of speech, reducing the predicamental series to a single genus of being and recognizing the noun as the main part of speech. The authors conclude that in his intention to carry out a reform of logic in the spirit of Ramism, Dalgarno was simultaneously oriented towards the rationalist and empiricist tendencies in New Age philosophy, which largely determined the originality of his logical and linguistic doctrine and influenced the Leibnizian project of universal characteristic.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2024-06-30
How to Cite
Osminskaya N., & RakhmankulovE. (2024). Indefeasibility of Doubt. Philosophy Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 8(2), 303-330. https://doi.org/10.17323/2587-8719-2024-2-303-330
Section
Translations and Critical Editions

Most read articles by the same author(s)